Premier League · 10. feb. 2026
Everton
Bournemouth
Et utvalg av våre tidligere tips
- 10. feb. 2026Premier League
Everton
Bournemouth- Under 4,5 mål@ 1,13 · innsats 1,20% · spillekapital +0,16%Vunnet
- Everton, innsatsen tilbake ved uavgjort@ 1,69Tapt
- Begge lag scorer@ 1,62Vunnet
- Over 1,5 mål@ 1,26 · innsats 1,80% · spillekapital +0,47%Vunnet
Analyse
Kampanalysen slik den ble publisert den gangen.
Everton come into the home league game against Bournemouth on more solid foundations: across 26 league matches they are on 29 goals conceded based on the goalkeeper metrics (Pickford 1.10 goals conceded/90), which overall points to disciplined defending. At the same time, the attacking play is not outstanding: the team’s goals are spread around rather than relying on one standout scorer (e.g. Barry 5, Ndiaye 4, Dewsbury-Hall 5 league goals), and Jack Grealish’s absence could be felt in terms of creativity (one of the squad’s best assist providers).
Bournemouth’s games are much more “open”: they’ve conceded 44 goals in 25 league matches (Petrović 1.76 goals conceded/90), while up front several players regularly get shots away (Evanilson 2.56 shots/90, Semenyo 2.45 shots/90, Kroupi with a high on-target rate). The expert section highlights the Cherries’ weak away defending (conceding plenty on the road), which suits the hosts, even if Everton don’t always post the same points-per-game at home.
In terms of how the match could play out, Everton are expected to build in a more controlled, cautious way, while Bournemouth may lean more on quicker, more direct finishes - that raises the number of chances, but given Everton’s defensive organisation it doesn’t necessarily mean a goal-fest. The main uncertainties: Everton’s creative edge without Grealish, and Bournemouth’s multiple absences (midfield/wide areas), which could also limit the visitors’ build-up and transitions.
Dette er et utvalg av våre beste tips, ikke hele historikken. De er fra våre tidligere tjenester, inngår ikke i Nortips tidsstemplede og hash-låste historikk, og vises slik de ble publisert.